Computer Investigations
Security Forensics with our partners, provide legal and litigation
services. Our knowledge of these services, the methodology in which
we follow and the tools in which we use, enables our clients to
present the best possible case using the latest in forensic technology
available today. We work with the most recognized partners in the
legal profession helping deliver on all of parts of the discovery
process, including expert witness testimony.
Our legal support provides...
Expertise in preserving evidentiary integrity
Assistance in the preparation of legal documentation for civil suite
and criminal investigation
The ability to prepare cases for prosecutorial referral
The development of Non-Disclosure Agreements
The ability to structure internal investigations through legal counsel
Security Forensics, Inc. and will perform:
- Full-scale computer forensic analysis
- Special Master court appointment
- “Live” computer forensic acquisitions when necessary
- Secure facilities and computer forensic lab
- Computer forensic software tools that have been validated in
court
- Seminars and presentations on “Electronic Discovery and
Computer Forensics”
- National and international services
Security Forensics, Inc. will:
- Assist in the preparation of discovery requests
- Collect and preserve discoverable evidence
- Initiate and maintain a continuing chain of custody
- Use procedures that will ensure the integrity of any evidence
collected
- Forensically analyze and discover all relevant data, including
deleted/hidden data
- Produce detailed and understandable reports of forensic analysis
- Provide expert witness testimony
Electronic Discovery
Electronic discovery is the acquisition, forensic review and production
of electronic documents associated with legal and government proceedings.
“Documents” are defined to include email messages and
associated file attachments, memos, reports, plain text files, spreadsheets,
digital art and photos, presentations and any other data that is
created or stored on a computer, computer network or other storage
media to included deleted files.
Recent studies show that 93% of business documents are created
electronically, and less than a third ever reaches the hard-copy
stage. Nearly 10 billion email messages are composed and sent each
day. Clearly, evidence is growing in volume and harder to access.
Key information may not be visible during depositions and paper-based
document review, yet can be crucial to your legal matter.
Data Acquisition:
Our partnerships’ expertise and experience
to rapidly identify and collect large quantities of data from single
and multiple sources, maintaining a complete chain of custody and
ensuring that your evidence is never compromised.
Forensic Review:
Aggregates your electronic data that has been
acquired and reviews the data using court accepted methodologies
and software to locate the information you are looking for. We quickly
identify and cull important information into an easily readable
report. We maintain a complete history and a legally defensible
audit trail during the entire process.
Data Production:
Delivering the report and original copies of the
acquired images on DVD-ROM. The report will also be included as
a report that can be included as an attachment to your legal proceedings.
Types of cases:
White Collar Cases
Malpractice Cases
Intellectual Property Cases
Contracts
Employment Cases |
Divorce Cases
Employee Misconduct
Business Litigation
Sexual Harassment Cases
Securities Litigation |
Discrimination Cases
Product Liability Cases
Criminal Defense
Asset Determination
Patent and Trademark Cases |
Case law:
“Electronic evidence is frequently cheaper and easier to produce
than paper evidence because it can be searched automatically, key
words can be run for privilege checks, and the production can be
made in electronic form obviating the need for mass photocopying.”
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg, 2003 WL 21087884 (S.D.N.Y.)
Antioch Co. v. Scrapbook Borders, Inc., 210 F.R.D. 645 (D. Minnesota
2002) Court granted motion to compel discovery even before Rule
26(f) conference because court concluded that relevant information
may be overwritten by normal computer use.
Kucala Enterprises, Ltd. v. Auto Wax Co., Inc., 2003 WL 21230605
(N.D. Illinois) Court held that Plaintiff’s deletion and overwriting
of files in the midst of litigation amounted to “egregious
conduct” in violation of the duty to maintain and preserve
evidence.
Prudential Ins. Co. of America Sales Practices Lit., 169 F.R.D.
598 (D. New Jersey 1997) Sanction of $1 million and attorneys fees
for not acting quickly and efficiently to prevent the destruction
of data.
|